|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
Venustas Blue
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2011.11.18 20:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
Innominate wrote:Quote: New drone bay capacities will be: 30 Fighters and/or Fighter Bombers for the Aeon, Revenant and Wyvern; 35 Fighters and/or Fighter Bombers for the Nyx and Hel.
So, take as a given that all supercarriers will carry 20 bombers. This leaves the Aeon/Wyvern room to carry 10 fighters, and the Nyx/Hel room for 15. The nyx gets a 25% damage bonus to fighters on top of that, fielding effectively 18.75 fighters. Under these changes the nyx is able to do 87.5% more damage with fighters than the Aeon/Wyvern, this is more fighter damage than the Aeon/Wyvern generally do currently. It makes sense for the lower EHP Nyx/Hel to do more damage than the Aeon/Wyvern. The 50% effective fighter damage bonus from the drone bay size seems more than enough for fighters. The Nyx doing nearly double the fighter damage of the Aeon/Wyvern is ridiculous. Perhaps modify the nyxes damage bonus to apply to fighter bombers only?
Not intended to be offensive to you Goony,but CCP you cannot expect to calm peoples anger by eventually making room for a few more Fighters/fighter Bombers when you know your in the wrong,every Super Pilot out there knows your in the wrong, there should be a full compliment of 20 Fighters & 20 Fighter bombers anyway, do not think you can mess us about by thinking that this insult will sufice. Phunnestyle is right, listen to him and damn well do it,stop making such a hash of this. |
Venustas Blue
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.22 14:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Svennig wrote:Phunnestyle wrote:Vincent Gaines wrote:So I ask again, why do you need more than 15 fighters? 1stly Supers will have optimal amount of fighters due to being intercepted by Subcaps, it happens often enough now, but after the patch alot more Subcap fleets will have the ballz & new compositions to play with to go ballz deep on Supers. By that logic, dreadnaughts should fit battleship guns so that when they encounter a battleship fleet they can take them on. Or you could realise that anti-subcap operations is not the role of either dreadnoughts OR supercarriers - it's something you should be leaving to your subcap fleet?
Well thats wrong, DC are about the only group of terrible players in EVE that this could really effectively apply to,as they are the only ones with such massive 1500-2000+ man blobs etc.
Every other alliance/coalitions would not just be able to rely on lets say there core function of MB 150-300 Subcap pilots in the majority of cases.
You cannot compare Dreads to Supers, you are trying to make chalk & cheese mix. Dreads are a fraction of the price and as it is they have been buffed to supply more oppertunitys and roles to these dread alts/pilots wich is good. But in no way should you try to make your self believe that becuase a 22bill+ ship has some capabilities to defend it self from Subcaps, that it gives the right for a dred of 2bill to have the same capabilities. But then again your insight is mildly amuzing & funny. |
Venustas Blue
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 14:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
What I would like to know is HOW SOON AFTER crucible is released will you be able to amend the change to Supers drone bay! As I think has been said once twice, a dozen, a hundred a 126742342 times in this threat & the original rebalancing thread ETC by actual knowledgeable Pilots that have experiece in all aspects of pvp, not just the original short sight of the mainstream subcap pilot.Supers need drone bay capacity for 20x FBs & 20x Fighters. Cannot come soon enough.......... |
Venustas Blue
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
12
|
Posted - 2011.12.12 17:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Svennig wrote:Keep spamming phunnestyle. I'm sure being an annoying ass will do loads to make CCP consider your argument carefully.
His arguements arn't just his, they are alot of peoples arguements and common sence. I mean what are you trying to point out Svennig, your comments have always seemed kinda mehhh.
|
|
|
|